![]() He stated that the subpoena was an attempt to "shake the electronic tree in the hope some kind of criminal charge drops out the bottom of it." ![]() Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, has interpreted the subpoena as a sign that US authorities were desperate to develop a criminal case against Assange. Lawmakers in Iceland criticised the subpoena as an instance of overreach. Nicholas Merrill, the first to file a constitutional challenge against the use of national security letters, describes this as "a perfect example of how the government can use its broad powers to silence people". The New York Times observed that the US government issues over fifty thousand such requests for information each year, typically accompanied by the so-called gag order, linking the case to how "1986 Privacy Law is Outrun by the Web". judge upheld the request of the federal prosecutor for the records. government is trying to criminalize whistleblowing and publication of whistleblowing material." Jonsdottir stated that she had contacted the Icelandic Minister of Justice and Human Rights and commented that the "U.S. Lawyer Aden Fine of the ACLU participated in defending those subpoenaed. government any records that prosecutors requested." Users' opposition to the subpoena Īmong those specifically named by the subpoena, Assange, Jonsdottir, Appelbaum and Gonggrijp all stated that they would oppose it. Do they realize I am a member of parliament in Iceland?" Īden Fine of the ACLU said that "Twitter's e-mail indicated that it had not yet turned over to the U.S. After Twitter informed Jonsdottir, she released a tweet stating "USA government wants to know about all my tweets and more since November 1st 2009. On 5 January 2011 it was notified of the success in its appeal, allowing the company to inform its users and to give them ten days in turn in which to appeal. Twitter applied to notify its users of the issue of the subpoena. ![]() WikiLeaks alleged it had reason to believe suggesting similar subpoenas had been issued to Google and Facebook, and lawyer Mark Stephens said that similar information had been sought from Google, Facebook and eBay's Skype unit. ![]() Īssange's lawyer Mark Stephens argued that since the application also extended to destination email addresses and IP addresses for any communication stored for the named accounts, personal identifying information was to be collected for some six hundred and thirty-four thousand followers of WikiLeaks' Twitter feed. The requested information included their user names, addresses, telephone numbers, bank account details, and credit card numbers. Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning, Rop Gonggrijp, Jacob Appelbaum and Birgitta Jonsdottir were named in the subpoena. The order additionally directed that Twitter should not disclose the existence of the subpoena without prior authorization. Department of Justice issued a subpoena directing Twitter to provide information in accordance with USC 18 2703(d). Chronology Subpoena issued with accompanying gag order Subsequent reactions included the discussion of secret subpoenas in the U.S., criticism of the particular subpoena issued, and calls for the recognition and emulation of Twitter's stance. While only five people were individually named within the subpoena, according to lawyer Mark Stephens the order effectively entailed the collection of personal identifying information of over six hundred thousand Twitter users, principally those who were followers of WikiLeaks. Twitter appealed against the accompanying gag order in order to be able to disclose its existence to its users, and was ultimately successful in its appeal. government sent Twitter a subpoena for information about Julian Assange and several other WikiLeaks-related persons, including Chelsea Manning. The WikiLeaks-related Twitter court orders were United States Department of Justice 2703(d) orders (called so because they are authorized by USC 18 2703(d)) accompanied by gag orders (authorized by USC 18 2705(b), both as differentiated from subpoenas and national security letters) issued to Twitter in relation to ongoing investigations of WikiLeaks issued on 14 December 2010. Subpoenas and gag orders sent to Twitter about WikiLeaks
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |